小朋友自己玩耍異常內向 要注意「語言發展遲緩」問題

◎ 行政院衛生署彰化醫院

 

彰化縣一名1歲10個月的恩恩，總是縮在角落自己玩，不理其他小朋友，媽媽發現與同年齡的小朋友互動差很多，開始詢問親戚朋友，才知道恩恩發展及學習比較慢，到署立彰化醫院兒童聯合發展門診，經過整個兒童發展評估，恩恩只有語言落後，參加相關治療課程，己經明顯進步。


署立彰化醫院兒童復健科陳佳莉主任表示，若確定沒有認知或聽力等方面等問題，像恩恩這樣單純的表達型語言發展遲緩，又受內向害羞的個性，影響他開口表達的意願，透過語言治療師營造自然互動的情境，技巧性的誘發與鼓勵，並示範給家長學習，孩子語言發展常常會有明顯的進步，加以時日還是有可能趕上同儕的發展水平。

陳佳莉主任提醒家長以下幾點要注意：1.孩子在任何年齡，與人沒有視覺接觸，沒有溝通意圖，沒有社會互動；2.週歲以後，沒有任何符號運用的能力（例如：點頭搖頭、搖手再見），或是對生活口語指示反應不良；3.兩歲以後仍無口語；4.三歲時還只會像鸚鵡學語般仿說；5.四歲時仍只會表達「電報式」的簡單句，詞彙間缺少連接詞；6.五歲時說話發音不準、構音不良。這些孩子溝通、與人互動上的表現，都有可能是「語言發展」出現遲緩。

宗喀巴之《密宗道次第廣論》卷十三、十四之簡易白話解釋（印度性愛瑜伽之「即身成佛」大妄想篇）

藏傳佛教依據《時輪本釋》有十五次第灌頂，前七個灌頂都是水灌頂，都與佛法修行的實證無關；在水灌頂之上，有為正式修行的密教行者而作的「瓶灌頂」，分兩階（各有四灌）：
　　第一階，喇嘛和一位明妃交合而射精，然後蒐集上師與明妃混合後的淫液給受密灌的信徒吃。再上一階，是由喇嘛性交九位明妃，再蒐集全部淫液給受密灌的信徒吃，然後把全部或少至一位明妃交給受灌的信徒，依喇嘛的教導當場合修雙身法；如是一位明妃或九位明妃的差別，和受密灌者的根器之不同──當然是由喇嘛依信徒的供養金及信受度來決定其根器。
　　弟子為受藏傳佛教的無上瑜伽灌頂，啟請上師；上師則以心種子放光召入諸灌頂佛及明妃於虛空中交合，弟子以五甘露等而作供養得以「清淨，轉識成智」[1]。
　　水灌頂的要義，喇嘛觀想密教如來溶化於水，入於口中而為灌頂；從自己的金剛尿道流出，住於喇嘛所觀想出來的明妃的蓮華（生殖器）陰蒂之中，最後轉變莊嚴而出生為不動如來及明妃互相交合受樂。所觀想出來的這種如來明妃性交等至（達到性高潮），大貪溶化（射精出來而）灌入喇嘛頂門中，隨即向下流至喇嘛的金剛尿道而出生菩提心（射出精液於）陰蒂蓮華之上，觀想自己已經出生為天身，以如是觀想而為弟子作水灌頂。
　　再說深入的兩階的四灌頂次第：
　　第一灌──瓶灌頂：弟子先得受金剛三昧耶、鈴三昧耶、印三昧耶，觀想金剛薩埵和明妃抱持性交，成為天父母之身，持鈴杵，手作抱持狀，從自心放光，迎請諸尊的金剛性交，由性器官尖端流注出水，作水灌頂；成就不動佛尊，而為印定，入弟子身，證印三昧耶，作天父母狀，得金剛阿闍黎灌頂。如是瓶灌頂的三昧耶，來灌注、洒淨、成就法器。
　　第二灌──密灌頂：弟子以幔帳隔成屏處，相信上師是金剛薩埵，奉獻即將受三昧耶的智慧母總共多至九位（簡稱九明），這些明妃是年滿十二或十六歲的容貌妙莊嚴的童女；若找不到童女時，可以自己的姊、妹、女兒、妻子，奉獻給喇嘛交合而為自己灌頂。
　　上師喇嘛觀想自己轉成佛身，將女子觀成是天女身，進行金剛蓮華性交，而入等至（進入性高潮）。心間種子放光，召請密教大日如來（佛父）與佛母性交，再觀想密教大日如來化入自身中，大貪溶化變成精液，下降到了尿道金剛摩尼（龜頭），最後流出而為弟子灌頂。
　　如是相信密教大日如來所化的和自身菩提心都是一樣，從蓮華女陰取出金剛精液，給弟子吞精。然而恐怕弟子親眼看見時不敢相信，故遮住受灌弟子的臉孔，安置精液於螺、盃之中，加上香水，假說「這是妙菩提心，為你灌頂」，即將精液放入弟子口中。弟子此時應當觀想這是密教如來所授予，一口吞嚥而下！如是以佛父佛母下體菩提心密物精液灌頂，稱為密灌頂。
　　第三灌：上師跟弟子說：你也要一起和這明妃性交，來受殊勝的妙樂，讓你產生性高潮。裸體的明妃也說：我的性器官具備一切安樂，作男女事，可得自在大樂！此時弟子要觀想自己為天身，明妃為天女，以坐姿來作互抱行淫之事，請密教的如來加持自身。
　　男性密教信徒的菩提心精液流入金剛摩尼（龜頭）前端，生起性高潮大樂；這時要認知這種樂受本無形色故是空性，男女金剛蓮華性器官相合，大樂圓滿次第皆無所得故也是空；如是勝妙智慧出生，每日八時（16個鐘頭）常保快樂而不與明妃的下體分離，名為樂空雙運。如是日日、月月、年年、一整劫、千劫，要長時間繼續受此淫樂，認為佛法智慧就會增廣。如是男女性交的俱生智慧，菩提心精液到了性器官頂端，若能夠阻止不出，產生大樂無分別心，認為能出生佛果而成為佛教中的報身佛！
　　第四灌：由第三灌出生的智慧，再由上師喇嘛口授婬欲空性之理，最後現起大印天身，得七支成就，為第四灌頂。成就佛身圓滿，與明妃而入性高潮等至，來攝受貪欲行的有情，盡未來際領受身心之大樂。第三灌頂之時要觀想自身顯現報身佛的身相，此後不離佛母（修密的女信徒），現身為佛父佛母互抱持相，盡未來際所有大樂都無自性，這止觀雙運、樂空雙運就是第四灌！
　　如是上師喇嘛告訴弟子：「你已經修成三種金剛無分別身，於修樂空雙運圓滿次第而得自在，如是灌頂三昧耶說：『你可殺害其他有情，受用婬欲他人的女子，可行一切取用偷盜，到處說妄語，你都不算是犯戒！』」這就是藏傳佛教密宗最高領導者達賴喇嘛所說的「喇嘛們戒行都很清淨」的真正意思。
　　傳授三禁行，其中明妃禁行：第四灌頂後，將明妃交付給弟子說：「諸佛作證，我將她授與你！若行者離開婬欲大樂三摩地，無任何法可成佛！因此不應捨離女人！這是一切諸佛無上明禁行，若有愚人捨離男女欲愛，永無大成就！」
　　金剛禁行：認定弟子為金剛薩埵身，以菩提心精液為金剛，為諸佛之禁行。行禁行者，要唸咒加持於耳璫、項飾等裝飾。
　　這時上師喇嘛說：「你已經出離三有惡趣，成為金剛薩埵佛，我為汝授記了！」弟子便搖鈴讚歎及發願說：「這樣殊勝灌頂最為無上，我要遍滿一切處，來轉這婬欲法輪，利益有情！」
　　上師說：「你今天在此壇場持咒續，諸佛菩薩悉證知你解脫一切罪，定為三界法王，現成佛果！但你如果捨離貪慾，就會遠離三界；因此你不可捨棄貪欲，應當盡情受用男女行婬欲事，食五肉、五甘露，如是一切都沒有罪過。你不用擔心畏懼，不可違背這個三昧耶戒！一切諸佛菩薩會加持，你今日已經出生在佛家[2]！」以上是藏傳佛教自己施設的妄想成佛之法。

如來正說
　　如果透過幻想的觀想，也可以成佛，這其實只有密教的祖師寫出來的密續中才這樣說，一切佛經中都沒有這樣說，而且密宗這樣的成佛與佛教中說的成佛境界完全不同，卻與婆羅門教的性力派所說子孫生生不息的輪迴境界完全相同。
　　釋迦如來在真正的密教經典《大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經》如此開示：「阿難！如何是修行上的『攝心』呢？我明定為攝受第八識金剛心如來藏為『法戒』──攝心為戒。任何一個世界的六道眾生，如果他的心不貪婬慾，便不會生死相續。」
　　「你修持三昧，本來的目的是要出離塵勞；然而婬心不除，永遠無法脫離塵世；縱然有殊勝智慧、禪定現前，如果不斷婬心，將來必定墮入魔道！上品是魔王、中品是魔民、下品則是魔女！當知：這樣諸魔，一樣是有徒眾，各各自說：已經成就無上道！」
　　「我釋迦如來示現滅度之後，在這個末法之中，多的是這樣的魔民，熾盛於世間，廣行貪婬，詐現為善知識；使得眾生陷落於愛見的大坑，失去了真正的菩提路！你將來教導世人修實相三摩地時，應該教導大眾先斷除心婬，是名如來先佛世尊第一決定的清淨教誨！」
　　「所以，阿難！如果不肯斷除婬心，來修禪定三昧，就好比是蒸煮沙石，想要變成飯，這樣即使經過百千劫，還只是個『熱沙』；為什麼呢？因為這本來就只是沙石，哪裡可以煮成飯呢！」
　　「你若以婬身，求證佛陀的清淨妙果，縱使可得到妙悟，皆是貪婬的根本！根本成婬，輪轉三途，必不能出！如來涅槃，何路修證？必定要使婬機、身體之行、心念等身口意行都一起斷除！連斷除的念都不必生起，如是和婬欲無有交涉，這樣佛菩提的修證才有可能！若是如我所說的一樣，名之為　佛說！如果不如此說，就是魔王波旬所說！」
　　所以宗喀巴的終極性愛──「婬欲大貪之道」，只是傳承自婆羅門教男女性愛的無上瑜伽，既不能使人斷我見而證聲聞初果，也不能使人證得第八識阿賴耶識，不能成為真正的菩薩，根本沒有任何「佛道」的內涵可言！
　　請問你要相信離欲清淨的本師　釋迦牟尼佛？還是永遠貪著婬欲雙身法的密教的假大日如來？你要相信中國幾千年來的清淨僧侶所說的清淨佛法？還是這西藏大貪淫的大喇嘛宗喀巴所說的死後會下墮三途的婬欲法？
[1]這其實是不淨的，也不是佛教中證得妙觀察智等的轉識成智的內容，只是套用佛教名詞。
[2]「生在佛家」意為進入初地聖位了。

藏傳佛教的障眼法--第二則─修無上瑜伽可以即身成佛(轉載)

正覺教育基金會執行長張公僕表示，藏傳佛教有許多的障眼法，用來炫惑徒眾，例如喇嘛們說「無上瑜伽」男女雙身法可以即身成佛，即是其中之一的謊言；藏傳佛教將男女性交的淫慾法套入佛法名相中，將男女在閨房中的行房技術，說之為修行；美其名為無上解脫之道，就是他們所說的「無上瑜伽」。
釋迦牟尼佛以他自己的經歷教授弟子，必須先求得佛法的見道以後，再經過累劫修菩薩行，最後才能成就佛道，要成佛必須具備智慧與福德的圓滿，才有可能如釋迦牟尼佛在人間「示現成佛」。釋迦牟尼佛在人間「示現成佛」，目的是要讓眾生了知，透過修行是可以成佛的；也因為如此，在悉達多太子未成佛之前，示現如凡夫一般，廣學一切外道法，最後才在金剛座一手按地「明心」，於天將明時目睹明星而「眼見佛性」，圓明四智而成就佛道。
反觀藏傳佛教的「即身成佛」，完全不是那麼一回事；他們成佛的方法，不是佛教的「明心見性」，而是依靠與異性性交修雙身法，以成就自己妄想創立的「佛父與佛母」；這種行為落入身觸的意識境界，完全與世間的傳宗接代沒有兩樣。一般人聽到了「雙身法」大多會狐疑：這樣子就是佛法修行嗎？性交能夠成佛嗎？但是，說性交可以成佛，這可是那些法王、活佛、包括達賴喇嘛書中說的啊！
正覺教育基金會之所以甘冒大不諱，來捅藏傳佛教這個天下第一大的馬蜂窩，最主要的目的，就是要避免不知藏傳佛教內情的婦女受騙、上當。所以要進入藏傳佛教學法，首先就要了知法王、活佛、達賴喇嘛這批人，真的有如他們號稱的佛法證量嗎？如果他們到最後，只會拐騙女人上床搞雙修，那麼這個宗教的主軸就是「無上瑜伽」男女雙身法，是個道道地地的「性愛團體」，什麼灌頂、火供、煙供、觀想、持咒、氣功等，全都是「引君入甕」的前方便；用「灌頂」作為引導，最後就是婦女「失財又失身」，敬請千萬切記！萬般小心！（採訪組報導）20111024

正覺教育基金會採訪組

Famous Commentators Step Forward and Speak Out Rightfully; How Can Buddhist Monks Keep Silent?

Within consecutive days, after our news network reported that the True Enlightenment Education Foundation has been exposing the inside story of Tibetan “Buddhism,” feedback from the general public is enthusiastic. After threatening a lawsuit against the True Enlightenment Education Foundation for distorting their doctrines, the Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama has not taken any further action. Gongpu Zhang, Executive of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, expresses his views as follows: Our Foundation is never afraid of the probable lawsuit filed by the Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama. Whenever the case comes to court, the True Enlightenment Education Foundation will present more evidence of tantras to prove that the fundamental doctrines of Tibetan “Buddhism” is to have the couple-practice of copulation with many sexual partners of the opposite sex, and point out the fact that the Dalai Lama has still been openly advocating the evil teaching of the couple-practice in recent years. Based on the court’s decision, Tibetan “Buddhism” would then be ruled as an evil cult, which flagrantly violates social orders and family values.
Zhang states, “We have been waiting, and we believe that Mr. Dawa Tsering of the Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama does not wish to bring the case to court. But, in fact, his response statement is merely a showcase toward their Tantric Followers and the general public in order to cover up his false claim and allow the issue to die down finally. If Tibetan “Buddhism” really brings the case to court, the Foundation could perhaps prove that Tibetan “Buddhism” is an evil belief through the court debate, but the remaining question is whether the court would accept the doctrine debate and rule on the case. In the meantime, the Foundation will continue to educate the general public to stay away from any evil cult and avoid the sexual abuses by lamas.” In order to serve and satisfy our readers, with coverage from different angles, our interviewing team has particularly checked with the opinions of some social elites.
Mr. Li Ao is a historian who talked about Tibetan “Buddhism” in his show “Li Ao has Something To Say” in September, 2006. He commented that the so-called Tibetan “Buddhism” worships those weird things with horrible appearances as gods. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXUtBfNAnEE&feature=related)
According to Mr. Li’s comment on Tibetan “Buddhism”, Gongpu Zhang, CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, states that the so-called Tibetan “Buddhism” in fact is not orthodox Buddhism; this is because their god statues with demons’ appearances only started to appear in the seventh century. Gongpu Zhang continues that Li’s comment and the historical facts corroborate the True Enlightenment Education Foundation’s constant statement that “Tibetan ‘Buddhism’ is not Buddhism.” According to the analysis of the historical facts, after the India’s Gupta dynasty (during the time period of 320 to 600 AD), Buddhism was gradually deteriorating due to its profound complexity and extreme difficulty in realizing the true reality, it eventually lost its ground; on the other hand, Hinduism was slowly arising and had spread mainly in south India. Although Buddhism was under the protection of the Para dynasty during 750-1150 AD and had been preserved for quite a long period of time, Buddhism was eventually infiltrated by Hindu Tantrism and changed into nowadays Tibetan Tantrism. Tibetan Tantrism, also known as Tantra, is essentially Tibetan “Buddhism.” The word Tantra derives from the root word “tan,” which refers to proliferation or reproduction. The couple-practice of copulation by a male and female couple of Tibetan “Buddhism” is a deformed product of Tantrism from Hinduism; in essence, it is totally NOT Buddhism.
Gongpu Zhang states that the gradual qualitative change resulted in a distorted Buddhism; for example, the female creative vitality is substituted for the “prajna” of Buddhism; the male creative vitality is substituted for the “expediency” of Buddhism; the lotus is a symbol of the female genitals; and the Vajra pestle is a symbol of the male genitals. The so-called Tibetan “Buddhism” consists of the imaginary yin-yang copulations and the actual sexual intercourse with multiple partners of the opposite sex. Such distorted teachings have already turned Buddhism into a kind of nondescript, neither fish nor fowl. Later on, such “Buddhism” spread into Tibet and combined with a native Tibetan religion, Bonpa, to form Tibetan “Buddhism.” Nevertheless, Tibetan “Buddhism” still claims its teachings as the Buddha dharma to fool the whole world, but in fact the doctrines of Tibetan “Buddhism” have nothing to do with the teachings of the Buddhist liberation or nirvana.
Zhang Gongpu further points out that with further studies into the doctrinal connotation and ritual manifestation, it is even more evident that Tibetan “Buddhism” essentially derives from Hindu Shaktism and is not Buddhism at all. In the Brahman culture of ancient India, sex and religion were tightly connected. There was a Tantra system of faith. Not only did its doctrines have no rejection of the mundane joy, but on the contrary, the decadent physical pleasure was sought out with every effort. Sex temples in India focused on sexual belief and energy; followers aimed at obtaining physical pleasure through sex. The most famous ritual is the “five kinds of enjoyment” (Panchamakara, also known as the Five Ms: meat, fish, wine, grain, and sex) which many couples attended. In addition to four kinds of food (fish, meat, wine, and grain) which satisfy the desire for good food, the fifth is to engage in multiple partners’ sex.
After bountiful food and drink, men and women engaged in group sex to indulge in the decadent bodily pleasure. There was absolutely no spiritual elevation. They have misunderstood that group sex can give them the most boost to enlightenment. In actuality, group sex is the quickest way to hell. While having sex, the participants chanted their own sutras or practiced yoga. They even change sex partners frequently to strengthen the effect. This is probably the oldest form of wife-swapping. This ritual pattern of taking abundant food (meat, fish, wine, and grain) ahead of having group sex without restraining from meat and alcohol is being currently instructed by the Kalachakra Vajra Tantra in Tibetan Buddhism. This corroborates that Tibetan Buddhism is indeed not Buddhism, but an evil religion derived from Hindu Shaktism, which had gradually infiltrated into Buddhism.
Zhang Gongpu indicates that this is enough to justify Mr. Li Ao's commentary. Condemning Tibetan “Buddhism” as monstrous and demoniac openly, Mr. Li Ao also criticizes blind believers of Tibetan Tantric Buddhism. He says, "Some puzzleheaded people are eager to gain wisdom from Tibet, which is just ridiculous to me. What wisdom could Tibetans possibly offer us? Nothing, but absurdity."
CEO Zhang also points out that as a women-protection activist, Ms. Shi Jiqing also straight-forwardly criticizes lamas, rinpoches, and dharma-kings who set up a religious belief of ghosts and gods, and ask followers to donate. They fool and trick followers, molest and rape women and then dignify it as the Couple-Practice Tantra. (http://jackiexie.blogspot.com/search/label/%E6%98%8E%E5%A6%83)
She suggests that Japanese porn film producers could invite lamas to perform in porn movies. The producers would make a fortune and lamas would have another financial resource. Ms. Shi also queries the validity of their statements regarding the Couple-Practice Tantra. If the Couple-Practice could facilitate practitioners to achieve Buddhahood, then every porn actor should be able to become Buddha instantly.
CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, Zhang Gongpu indicates that Mr. Li Ao and Ms. Shi Jiqing are both social celebrities. They have built up an image of being forthright, outspoken for justice. Being public figures, they may have their own supporters and foes. Nevertheless, on the issue of the Couple-Practice Tantra of Tibetan Tantric Buddhism, one commented on the basis of historical evidence, and the other spoke from many years of pragmatic experience on women protection. They are not just pointing fingers randomly! As non-Buddhists, Mr. Li and Ms. Shi both exposed the flat lies of the Couple-Practice Tantra of Tibetan “Buddhism” and pointed out the truth that Tibetan “Buddhism” is definitely not Buddhism. How can millions of Buddhist disciples in Taiwan still look the other way and keep silent with hypocritical mindset? Where is the compassion that all Buddhist masters always speak about? Numerous Buddhist followers are being misled into the evil doctrines of Tibetan Tantric Buddhism. Great Buddhist masters, why won't you speak out to salvage these believers? Have you lost all your compassion so that you would rather sit back and watch without going to the rescue? Please show some compassion and step forward to save the mass of your disciples! (Reported By You Shuqing) 20111016
Editor's Note:
This article is an English version of the Chinese edition published on March 15, 2011

真心新聞網:藏傳佛教的「慧覺」也受「金剛戒」？-- 密宗外護的野干鳴‧之十七

正覺教育基金會執行長張公僕先生表示，《佛遺教經》說：「戒為正順解脫本」，《華嚴經》更說：「戒為無上菩提本」；佛陀在捨報之前，更提示大眾要依戒為師，可見持戒對於佛教弟子的重要。 我們樂見慧覺終於對持戒有所討論，但是對於慧覺相關知見的偏差，和被藏密邪教誤導，導致非戒取戒，就不能苟同。
慧覺原文第十七段：「正如大地是萬物的根基一樣，一切善行，即修行的根基是持戒。“一個人應該像愛護自己的眼睛一樣維護佛門戒律。”達賴喇嘛尊者在《智慧的窗扉》中寫道。」
「戒律概括起來有三種：波羅提木叉戒，菩薩戒，以及金剛戒。每一個修習階段，都有不同的戒律需要遵守。但是，戒律之間並不是孤立的，破了最基礎的戒中的任何一條，也很可能就破了其他的戒，包括金剛戒。」
對於慧覺所說：「正如大地是萬物的根基一樣，一切善行，即修行的根基是持戒。」然而譬喻要合情合理才能讓人接受，就像此處的譬喻便有錯誤，因為「萬物的根基」並不是「大地」；執行長問：雲的根基在大地嗎？浪花可是泥土中種出來的？試請慧覺從大地上生一隻鳥出來試試看，或是從草叢中撈出一尾魚也行！慧覺既然是佛弟子，在法義辨正中，就不能學文人墨客作世俗譬喻；會做這樣因果錯亂的譬喻，代表了其人佛法知見的嚴重錯謬，不能真的認知「萬物的根基」，所以用譬時自然就漏洞百出。
弘傳佛法、辯論法義不能馬虎苟且，所謂「因地不真，果招迂曲」，在論義中若是開頭的認知有所偏差，後面的議論都會站不住腳，包括慧覺說的「一切善行」、「修行的根基」乃至「持戒」。真正「萬物的根基」是心，不是物；不是像「大地」那樣的色法，而是法界實相，吾人的真實心如來藏，祂能出生萬法，包括「善行」與「持戒」等等；有了這個認識的基礎來談持戒，才是三乘菩提實相法義；雖然二乘法中不涉及法界實相，但是二乘人仍要依止於 世尊所開示的，無餘涅槃非斷滅、有「本際」第八識常住不壞等正見為前提，來觀察蘊處界無常、苦、空、無我，這樣子談持戒才有意義，否則一切皆外鑠於我，持戒修行就只是石頭壓草，不契無我妙法，持戒就會變成如同「遵守法律」的表面行為，那不是真持佛戒。
正如《華嚴經》有云：「忘失菩提心（離開三乘菩提），修諸善法，是名魔業。」持戒也不例外。
慧覺說：「一切善行，即修行的根基是持戒。」然而「修行的根基」既不是「一切善行」、也不是「持戒」，此二者都是「被建立法」而不是「本來根基」。「修行的根基」乃是慧覺所不瞭解的「如來藏」，試想若沒有如來藏出生五陰、萬法，哪有是非得失？又哪有佛法與戒律？若非如來藏出生眾生的五陰六識，有誰來持戒？又是誰去了知戒相分別善惡？若非如來藏執持八識心王與諸業種，誰得戒體、誰能持犯？
慧覺對於持戒之能持、所持俱不了知，卻空談「善行」，連何者為善的標準都無法建立，又何來「修行的根基」可言？再說菩薩戒的內容是所謂「三聚淨戒」：「攝律儀戒、攝善法戒、饒益有情戒」，其中雖含「一切善行」在內，但是「一切善行」也只是戒行的一部份而已，不似慧覺所言，全等於「修行的根基」及「持戒」。
再往下看，慧覺說：「一個人應該像愛護自己的眼睛一樣維護佛門戒律。”達賴喇嘛尊者在《智慧的窗扉》中寫道。」慧覺「訴諸權威」引用達賴喇嘛的話，但達賴是破壞佛戒者，他並不是「佛門戒律」的權威，所以達賴的言論根本就沒有佐證或參考的價值。
歷代的達賴於佛法三乘菩提均無實證，現今之達賴十四世，觀察他的所言所行，連斷我見都做不到，這樣一個凡夫居然以觀世音菩薩的化身自居，早已犯了大妄語的重戒；高唱著戒行應該清淨的口號，身居高座卻反而大力弘傳雙身修法，等於教人故意違犯邪淫重戒，則本身戒體已失，卻大言不慚為人開示：「一個人應該像愛護自己的眼睛一樣維護佛門戒律」，有何意義？執行長指出，這句話就代表達賴和慧覺一樣，喜歡睜眼說瞎話，因為他所維護的不是佛門的戒律，而是藏傳佛教自設的偽戒。
慧覺說：「戒律概括起來有三種：波羅提木叉戒，菩薩戒，以及金剛戒。」佛教的戒律，因應四眾弟子身分的不同，而分成許多不同種類之戒，各各戒相極其繁複；在每一條戒中，又有開、遮、持、犯的分別；又因動機（根本）、方法（方便）、結果（成已）等的不同，所犯罪責的輕重，及懺罪的方式也會隨著不同，這些都是達賴喇嘛所不懂的，更別說是食達賴涎唾的慧覺了
執行長分析，譬如慧覺所言「波羅提木叉戒」，華語譯為「別解脫戒」，那是因為依受戒者不同身分所受之「正解脫戒」，而相對說有「別解脫戒」。譬如依二乘法出家者，心求出離三界生死而無菩薩性，要受聲聞具足戒為正解脫戒，視菩薩戒為別解脫戒；若依大乘法而出家示現聲聞相的菩薩，心求成佛之道而永不入無餘涅槃，則以菩薩戒為正解脫戒，兼受聲聞戒為別解脫戒；依大乘法出家而示現為菩薩相或者在家菩薩們，則以菩薩戒為正解脫戒，故只受菩薩戒而不受聲聞別解脫戒。
無論是「波羅提木叉戒」，或是「菩薩戒」，在藏傳佛教中都有不同於佛教戒律的嚴重曲解，例如：藏傳佛教陳健民上師的《曲肱齋全集》有言：「與三戒相配：（淫行時的樂觸）剎那不斷，為別解脫戒；樂為他（人而合修雙身法）故，為菩薩戒；自生本尊明顯，不越空樂大樂智慧（安住於性交的樂空雙運中），為密宗戒（即是慧覺所說「金剛戒」者）。另外，所說「犯戒」則是：「於女子行漏失菩提（於女子身上行此雙身修法時，若自己漏失「白菩提」精液者），犯別解脫戒；自心貪圖安樂（唯求自己之安樂享受而不理會女方是否亦同到性高潮者），犯菩薩戒；斷喪明點（若射精而漏失精液明點者）、即斷一切本尊空行心命，犯密宗根本戒。」
如此觀之，藏傳佛教不論在所謂「波羅提木叉戒」、「菩薩戒」乃至「密宗戒」等，皆盡曲解成為戲論；雖然襲用佛戒名相，卻完全不是佛戒的內容。他們的「持戒」已是違犯了佛所制重戒，更何況藏密的「密宗戒」(也就是慧覺所說的「金剛戒」)，連所謂「金剛乘」都不是 釋迦世尊所傳授，根本不是佛法，是由藏傳佛教祖師自意捏造的偽冒佛教；若是妄持所謂「金剛戒」，則是「非戒取戒」的「戒禁取」邪見，後果則是死後下墮三塗。因此慧覺所言：「每一個修習階段，都有不同的戒律需要遵守。」是無義語。
慧覺的結語是：「但是，戒律之間並不是孤立的，破了最基礎的戒中的任何一條，也很可能就破了其他的戒，包括金剛戒。」慧覺說的「戒律之間並不是孤立的」這句話本身沒有錯，但是藏傳佛教卻把各種戒都一一孤立而不能相通；例如與自己的母、姊性交，犯下了佛戒中邪淫重罪；但是藏傳佛教密宗卻說，若是自己的母親、姊妹已受密灌了，那時與自己的母親、姊妹性交修雙身法，則不犯「金剛戒」。像這樣的獸行，連人類的「格」都失去了，來世尚且保不住不人身，還說是在修學無上的成佛之法，豈不是癡人說夢？
在藏傳佛教中，有太多的邪見邪解，以下針對慧覺特別強調的「金剛戒」，我們就先予釐清，不能讓藏傳佛教繼續嚴重誤導眾生。
「金剛戒」就是藏傳佛教所謂的「三昧耶戒」，是藏傳佛教為了要實修「無上瑜伽樂空雙運」雙身法而量身打造的，那是違背了全部佛戒的荒謬而且無效的假「戒律」。三昧耶戒的根本精神在「十四根本墮」，也就是說，特別訂定十四條不能違犯的重罪為原則，如果違犯了就要下墮藏傳佛教自行創造的「金剛地獄」。
「十四根本墮」的最重罪，就在第一條的「輕蔑傳法阿闍黎」；這其實是結合了藏傳佛教必修的「四皈依」法，一方面高推上師更高於佛之上，另一方面，把對上師的依止轉為絕對服從、不許有任何的質疑，就會遵循上師教導的雙身法而開始與喇嘛上床合修享樂，也正是慧覺所謂「戒律之間並不是孤立的」之真正用意。從這個「四皈依」開始，甫一受戒就已經不如法了；因為受佛戒者，首先就是要歸依三寶成為正信的佛弟子，而藏傳佛教的「四皈依」則是皈依上師比皈依佛更重要，這分明是外道的邪法，顯然與佛法無關。
「十四根本墮」的其他條目也都是一些猥瑣的「戒相」，目的全在鞏固雙身法的持續修行，和保守秘密不能外洩，這些都是邪見語，與佛法三乘菩提的修證無關。
慧覺說：「破了最基礎的戒中的任何一條，也很可能就破了其他的戒，包括金剛戒。」應該說是：「受了金剛戒中的任何一條，就必定破了其他的戒，包括最基礎的『三歸』戒。」藏傳佛教既然自稱是佛教，本就應該依照釋迦牟尼佛制定的佛戒來受持，卻又發明了破壞佛戒的「金剛戒」來追逐男女淫樂，想要淫盡天下所有學密的美女，顯然心口不一，只是盜用佛教的名義及佛戒的名義，用來求取利養及免費的良家婦女作為行淫的工具。「金剛戒」既然是藏傳佛教為遂邪淫而量身打造，不想下地獄的人就該遠離它，奉勸慧覺千萬不要「殘腦適戒」，把脖子伸向上師喇嘛手中，讓人以「金剛戒」為名，把你拉向地獄。（採訪組報導）20111022

正覺教育基金會採訪組

Famous Commentators Step Forward and Speak Out Rightfully; How Can Buddhist Monks Keep Silent?(Reproduced)

Within consecutive days, after our news network reported that the True Enlightenment Education Foundation has been exposing the inside story of Tibetan “Buddhism,” feedback from the general public is enthusiastic. After threatening a lawsuit against the True Enlightenment Education Foundation for distorting their doctrines, the Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama has not taken any further action. Gongpu Zhang, Executive of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, expresses his views as follows: Our Foundation is never afraid of the probable lawsuit filed by the Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama. Whenever the case comes to court, the True Enlightenment Education Foundation will present more evidence of tantras to prove that the fundamental doctrines of Tibetan “Buddhism” is to have the couple-practice of copulation with many sexual partners of the opposite sex, and point out the fact that the Dalai Lama has still been openly advocating the evil teaching of the couple-practice in recent years. Based on the court’s decision, Tibetan “Buddhism” would then be ruled as an evil cult, which flagrantly violates social orders and family values.

Zhang states, “We have been waiting, and we believe that Mr. Dawa Tsering of the Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama does not wish to bring the case to court. But, in fact, his response statement is merely a showcase toward their Tantric Followers and the general public in order to cover up his false claim and allow the issue to die down finally. If Tibetan “Buddhism” really brings the case to court, the Foundation could perhaps prove that Tibetan “Buddhism” is an evil belief through the court debate, but the remaining question is whether the court would accept the doctrine debate and rule on the case. In the meantime, the Foundation will continue to educate the general public to stay away from any evil cult and avoid the sexual abuses by lamas.” In order to serve and satisfy our readers, with coverage from different angles, our interviewing team has particularly checked with the opinions of some social elites.

Mr. Li Ao is a historian who talked about Tibetan “Buddhism” in his show “Li Ao has Something To Say” in September, 2006. He commented that the so-called Tibetan “Buddhism” worships those weird things with horrible appearances as gods. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXUtBfNAnEE&feature=related)

According to Mr. Li’s comment on Tibetan “Buddhism”, Gongpu Zhang, CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, states that the so-called Tibetan “Buddhism” in fact is not orthodox Buddhism; this is because their god statues with demons’ appearances only started to appear in the seventh century. Gongpu Zhang continues that Li’s comment and the historical facts corroborate the True Enlightenment Education Foundation’s constant statement that “Tibetan ‘Buddhism’ is not Buddhism.” According to the analysis of the historical facts, after the India’s Gupta dynasty (during the time period of 320 to 600 AD), Buddhism was gradually deteriorating due to its profound complexity and extreme difficulty in realizing the true reality, it eventually lost its ground; on the other hand, Hinduism was slowly arising and had spread mainly in south India. Although Buddhism was under the protection of the Para dynasty during 750-1150 AD and had been preserved for quite a long period of time, Buddhism was eventually infiltrated by Hindu Tantrism and changed into nowadays Tibetan Tantrism. Tibetan Tantrism, also known as Tantra, is essentially Tibetan “Buddhism.” The word Tantra derives from the root word “tan,” which refers to proliferation or reproduction. The couple-practice of copulation by a male and female couple of Tibetan “Buddhism” is a deformed product of Tantrism from Hinduism; in essence, it is totally NOT Buddhism.

Gongpu Zhang states that the gradual qualitative change resulted in a distorted Buddhism; for example, the female creative vitality is substituted for the “prajna” of Buddhism; the male creative vitality is substituted for the “expediency” of Buddhism; the lotus is a symbol of the female genitals; and the Vajra pestle is a symbol of the male genitals. The so-called Tibetan “Buddhism” consists of the imaginary yin-yang copulations and the actual sexual intercourse with multiple partners of the opposite sex. Such distorted teachings have already turned Buddhism into a kind of nondescript, neither fish nor fowl. Later on, such “Buddhism” spread into Tibet and combined with a native Tibetan religion, Bonpa, to form Tibetan “Buddhism.” Nevertheless, Tibetan “Buddhism” still claims its teachings as the Buddha dharma to fool the whole world, but in fact the doctrines of Tibetan “Buddhism” have nothing to do with the teachings of the Buddhist liberation or nirvana.

Zhang Gongpu further points out that with further studies into the doctrinal connotation and ritual manifestation, it is even more evident that Tibetan “Buddhism” essentially derives from Hindu Shaktism and is not Buddhism at all. In the Brahman culture of ancient India, sex and religion were tightly connected. There was a Tantra system of faith. Not only did its doctrines have no rejection of the mundane joy, but on the contrary, the decadent physical pleasure was sought out with every effort. Sex temples in India focused on sexual belief and energy; followers aimed at obtaining physical pleasure through sex. The most famous ritual is the “five kinds of enjoyment” (Panchamakara, also known as the Five Ms: meat, fish, wine, grain, and sex) which many couples attended. In addition to four kinds of food (fish, meat, wine, and grain) which satisfy the desire for good food, the fifth is to engage in multiple partners’ sex.

After bountiful food and drink, men and women engaged in group sex to indulge in the decadent bodily pleasure. There was absolutely no spiritual elevation. They have misunderstood that group sex can give them the most boost to enlightenment. In actuality, group sex is the quickest way to hell. While having sex, the participants chanted their own sutras or practiced yoga. They even change sex partners frequently to strengthen the effect. This is probably the oldest form of wife-swapping. This ritual pattern of taking abundant food (meat, fish, wine, and grain) ahead of having group sex without restraining from meat and alcohol is being currently instructed by the Kalachakra Vajra Tantra in Tibetan Buddhism. This corroborates that Tibetan Buddhism is indeed not Buddhism, but an evil religion derived from Hindu Shaktism, which had gradually infiltrated into Buddhism.

Zhang Gongpu indicates that this is enough to justify Mr. Li Ao's commentary. Condemning Tibetan “Buddhism” as monstrous and demoniac openly, Mr. Li Ao also criticizes blind believers of Tibetan Tantric Buddhism. He says, "Some puzzleheaded people are eager to gain wisdom from Tibet, which is just ridiculous to me. What wisdom could Tibetans possibly offer us? Nothing, but absurdity."

CEO Zhang also points out that as a women-protection activist, Ms. Shi Jiqing also straight-forwardly criticizes lamas, rinpoches, and dharma-kings who set up a religious belief of ghosts and gods, and ask followers to donate. They fool and trick followers, molest and rape women and then dignify it as the Couple-Practice Tantra. (http://jackiexie.blogspot.com/search/label/%E6%98%8E%E5%A6%83)

She suggests that Japanese porn film producers could invite lamas to perform in porn movies. The producers would make a fortune and lamas would have another financial resource. Ms. Shi also queries the validity of their statements regarding the Couple-Practice Tantra. If the Couple-Practice could facilitate practitioners to achieve Buddhahood, then every porn actor should be able to become Buddha instantly.

CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, Zhang Gongpu indicates that Mr. Li Ao and Ms. Shi Jiqing are both social celebrities. They have built up an image of being forthright, outspoken for justice. Being public figures, they may have their own supporters and foes. Nevertheless, on the issue of the Couple-Practice Tantra of Tibetan Tantric Buddhism, one commented on the basis of historical evidence, and the other spoke from many years of pragmatic experience on women protection. They are not just pointing fingers randomly! As non-Buddhists, Mr. Li and Ms. Shi both exposed the flat lies of the Couple-Practice Tantra of Tibetan “Buddhism” and pointed out the truth that Tibetan “Buddhism” is definitely not Buddhism. How can millions of Buddhist disciples in Taiwan still look the other way and keep silent with hypocritical mindset? Where is the compassion that all Buddhist masters always speak about? Numerous Buddhist followers are being misled into the evil doctrines of Tibetan Tantric Buddhism. Great Buddhist masters, why won't you speak out to salvage these believers? Have you lost all your compassion so that you would rather sit back and watch without going to the rescue? Please show some compassion and step forward to save the mass of your disciples! (Reported By You Shuqing) 20111016

Editor's Note:

This article is an English version of the Chinese edition published on March 15, 2011

Reference Source: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart_en/16

真心新聞網: 藏傳佛教「慧覺」開拓的「捷徑」-- 密宗外護的野干鳴‧之十六(轉載)

正覺教育基金會執行長張公僕先生表示，慧覺謬文讀起來常令人覺得「上句不接下句」，或是「前言不搭後語」，又常冒出一些前後自打嘴巴的對照語詞；以下的兩小段文意本不連貫，但是各自文句都不長，故而放在一起，合為第十六段：
「多少個世紀以來，西藏佛教一直是精神和心識的科學，尤其密宗，為那些願意冥想之人開拓了一條引導精神與心識發展的文明的必由之路。 “正覺”對西藏佛教的玷污，正說明了，他們嫁禍於人的本質，並別有目的地求得一條從中國共產黨的那裏獲得利益的捷徑。」
首先，慧覺的第一句話：「多少個世紀以來，西藏佛教一直是精神和心識的科學，」這一句話已經是認知顛倒的表述。執行長指出「多少個世紀以來」眾所皆知的，藏傳佛教都是假冒佛教之名，行雙身法「無上瑜伽」邪淫之實，怎麼會跟「精神和心識的科學」有什麼聯結？
雙身法都是在眾生的五陰身上做功夫，著重在「肉慾」而非「精神」，所以這是藏傳佛教第一重顛倒的說詞；藏傳佛教的「修行」始自種種「觀想」，沉醉在「樂空不二」，自以為一念不生的境界就是諸佛的境界；但這些都是意識心的功能，實質上等於發呆冥想，或是做白日夢，與佛法深細的觀行斷結大異其趣；因此與其說是運用「心識」，不如說是「心識」的荒廢和濫用，名之為「心窒」還差不多，這是藏傳佛教第二重的顛倒。
藏傳佛教是冒牌的佛教，慧覺又幫它多偽冒一舉說為「科學」，如此憑空攀扯只會徒增笑柄而已；它「非宗教」、「非科學」，應該歸類為「迷信」比較接近事實；因此執行長總結分析，認為慧覺的三重顛倒說詞，應還原為「藏傳佛教一直是肉慾和心窒的迷信」，才符合有世間智慧大眾的認知。
慧覺又說：「為那些願意冥想之人開拓了一條引導精神與心識發展的文明的必由之路。」執行長為此憂心的表示，慧覺的麻煩大了，因為他不只是說詞顛倒，從這一句話看來，他對於中文文法的扭曲，和語言表達能力的障礙，全都非常嚴重；這也許正是多生多劫以來，經常誤犯謗法、謗善知識所引生的「不可愛異熟果報」；所以苦盡雖然還生人間、雖然非常努力的想把話說好，但所言仍難正常，這真值得訕謗者引以為戒。
不過執行長還是耐心的作語詞拆解，幫慧覺釐清所欲表達的意思。慧覺讚歎藏傳佛教「為那些願意冥想之人」「開拓」了路徑，然而事實上，願意以「冥想」作為此生歸趨的人並不多；除了少數人偶爾以「冥想」調養心性或作為修道「助行」之外，絕大部分的人都希望能如理思維，踏實工作，珍惜善緣，使生命及生活提升、圓滿。而其餘迷戀藏傳佛教的「冥想」者的「必經(由)之路」，其實是另外一條路，也就是榮民總醫院「長青樓」之類的處所；偏偏二者都是「文明」的死巷，不但「精神與心識發展」通透不出去，連迴身轉圜都難，還是不必「開拓」的好。
接下來慧覺話鋒狂飆猛轉，來了個「腦筋急甩尾」，徒然冒出來一句「”正覺”對西藏佛教的玷污，正說明了，他們嫁禍於人的本質」。慧覺對詞義的理解和使用，與常人有很大的認知落差，令人不禁搖頭。「玷污」意指垢穢染髒了潔淨的事物，但是慧覺竟然倒過來認定。「正覺」弘揚的是世尊正法，法水常清，與垢穢有何相干？藏傳佛教無論是穰祭給羅剎護法使用的「五肉」，或是結緣給信眾吃的的「五甘露」，或是灌頂時上師給徒弟灌飲的「紅、白菩提（喇嘛與明妃交合後的液體）」「都是一些腥臊噁心的東西」，甚至多為人體排泄物，像是大便、小便、淫液等，這才是「垢穢」吧？何況藏傳佛教的法義也是深深執著蘊處界——尤其是執著於欲界男女欲的染污法，這才真的叫作垢穢。
藏傳佛教無論在事相上還是理上，都是染污的法，平白無故的把世尊正法「玷污」了千餘年，至今為患更烈；更何況藏傳佛教大大小小的法王、活佛、上師、喇嘛，迄今仍不斷在世界各地「玷污」婦女，這類教義與事證俱在，藏傳佛教面對社會、眾生檢討，懺過都來不及了，居然還敢大聲反咬別人「玷污」，真是作賊的高喊捉賊。
<執行長甚至表示，究實的說，真正「玷污」唐代文成公主入藏，所攜入的北傳大乘佛法，和「玷污」早期只是求佛菩薩及護法神祇的加持，希求平安或修學佛法時少諸障礙的「真言乘」的兇手，正是混入了印度教性力派邪淫教義，現今自稱為「藏傳佛教」的國際宗教詐騙集團。
偽善的藏傳佛教，諸如慧覺等人在做種種語文表達時，往往前一句話還在「自讚」藏傳佛教有多麼「文明」，後一句卻立即不「文明」的「譭他」，就像在控訴：「誰用清水『玷污』了沾滿污油的抹布？」
這些舉止言行，正因應了慧覺用來強詞奪理的話：「正說明了，他們嫁禍於人的本質」；當別人都在寬容自制中「懲憤窒慾」的時候，藏傳佛教憑著「冥想」所開拓的「文明」，卻是一條「逞慾窒心」、反「文明」「必經之路」。
「嫁禍於人的本質」發揮得淋漓盡致的，是本段的末了：「……（指「正覺」）並別有目的地求得一條從中國共產黨的那裏獲得利益的捷徑。」張公僕執行長嚴正的表示，無論是「正覺同修會」的清教護法，還是正覺基金會的教育社會保護婦女，都只有「維繫佛教，救護眾生」的純正目的，向來沒有其他目的，更別說是與宗教無關的現實利益了。慧覺之所以會用化名躲在暗處，如此無根污衊別人，只證明了他完全不懂佛法中自利利他的道理，才會「別有目的地」「嫁禍於人」。
慧覺的謬文讀到此處，已經是第三度出現諸如「共產主義」「中國共產黨政權」「中國共產黨」等詞句。我們不太能理解：當我們在指陳一個弘傳千年的偽宗教時，這件事和政治或是政黨有什麼必要的關聯？執行長表示，起初還以為慧覺個人是「共產黨」或「共產主義」的「粉絲」，但是見其口氣卻是不以為然。本基金會不知道、也不想過問藏傳佛教或是慧覺個人，與特定的政黨或是政治主張有什麼恩怨情仇，但是勸請慧覺不要企圖轉移話題模糊焦點；藏傳佛教或是慧覺本人，總不能只靠著「嫁禍於人的本質」去作「冥想」，就打算如此輕易且「別有目的地」「玷污」「正覺」。
慧覺的說詞，就像是一個「強制性侵犯」，眼看自己就要被法官判罪定讞，便突然大聲高喊：「這不公平，一定是檢察官用微積分演算出我的犯罪模式的。」執行長對藏傳佛教和慧覺喊話：做法義辯論或辨正時，不要閃躲、也不允許暗算污蔑；要像個佛弟子，正大光明的面對就是了；讓宗教的歸宗教，政治的歸政治，勿以「莫須有」的罪名，去揣測或贓誣別人。
最後執行長感嘆，慧覺其實不知道，他這兩小段的文字，就是表現出自己的心態：「藏傳佛教對『正覺』的玷污，正說明了，他們嫁禍於人的本質，並別有目的地求得一條從『謗佛、謗法、謗大乘勝義僧團』那裏獲得直達無間地獄的捷徑。」執行長要慈悲勸請慧覺，目前除了及時醒悟殷重懺悔之外，一定要常念「南無大願地藏王菩薩」，千萬別再冥想雙身交抱的「普賢王如來」了，因為那恐將是慧覺長遠的未來際，唯一可以暫獲清涼的「必經之路」了，敬請珍重。（採訪組報導）20111015

正覺教育基金會採訪組

轉載自正覺教育基金會全球資訊網 http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart/149